How does the food always get past the bib?įor more on Past vs Passed, read this post by Ali. I thought he would stop, but he just ran past. The word past can be used as an adjective: Intransitive pass is also used as a euphemism for “die,” as in When did your father pass? I passed the church on my way to the store. The form passed is the past participle of the verb to pass. Careful writers need to find some trick for remembering the difference.īoth words derive from the same Latin noun: passus “step, pace.” From that noun came a Vulgar Latin verb passare “to step” or “to walk.” English took the word from Old French passer. They are pronounced alike and have similar meanings. The frequent confusion between the words passed and past is understandable. In short, the difference is derived from the degree. However, as a noun, the word past is the time before the present. The difference between them lies in the fact that as an adjective, past references to a time that existed before. “We want the debate,” said Mackenzie, as security removed dozens of people.Is it correct to say, “how does the food always get passed the bib? or past the bib”? As a noun, it means the period that preceded the present. Scuffles broke out as security removed the protesters. At one point, security staff rushed to the front of the meeting to shield the board as protesters tried to approach the stage. It was the 45-minute mark before Mackenzie formally opened the meeting, but protests continued for more than an hour. “We have heard you loud and clear,” Mackenzie said. That was followed by chants of “shut down Shell” and “we hate Jackdaw” – a reference to its North Sea oilfield. In answer, a crowd started singing: “Go to hell, Shell” to the tune of Hit the Road Jack by Percy Mayfield. Mackenzie repeatedly asked him to sit down, saying the company wanted to hear from others. He said: “Do you like David Attenborough, the most popular man in this country? He said it is crazy that banks and pension funds are investing in fossil fuels.” As soon as the meeting opened one protester stood up and began shouting. In response to the Follow This resolution, Sawan, a Lebanese-Canadian, cited a proverb to argue that pushing Shell to cut its production of oil and gas would be premature and would result in other fossil fuel producers filling the gap.Ī protester from Fossil Free London demonstrates outside Shell’s AGM at ExCeL. Mark van Baal, the founder of Follow This, told the meeting that shareholders voting in line with company management “enable Shell to continue to cause climate breakdown and jeopardise the long-term future of the company”. A similar Follow This resolution in 2022 also secured 20% support. Shell’s shareholders rejected the resolution by 79.8% to 20.2%, according to a preliminary count from the company. The group has gradually won increased support from large investors in recent years, although it has not yet managed a majority. The company asked shareholders to vote against the climate resolution, which was organised by the campaign group Follow This. However, he acknowledged that was only part of its total capital spending of $25bn – most of which was on oil and gas. Sawan said the company had invested $4.3bn (£3.5bn) in 2022 in low-carbon energy, including biofuels, hydrogen, electric car charging and renewable power. Wael Sawan, in his first annual meeting as Shell’s chief executive, and Andrew Mackenzie, Shell’s chair and the former chief executive of the mining company BHP, defended the company repeatedly against accusations that it was not switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy quickly enough.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |